No variable specified
Commissioner considers new law to save feral cats
by Tom Spigolon
June 25, 2014 05:21 PM | 2038 views | 1 1 comments | 37 37 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A county commissioner said he is considering seeking a new ordinance to help reduce feral cat populations through what some consider more humane methods than euthanizations.

Post 1 Commissioner Dave Carmichael said he plans to ask other commissioners to support his plan for an ordinance requiring feral cats to be trapped, neutered or spayed and returned to the location they were found.

“My constituents have known I’ve been interested in improvements in that area,” Carmichael said.

“A lot of progress is being made. There are always things we can do to ratchet it up.”

Carmichael last week helped organize two public meetings featuring attorney Liz Holtz of the national feral cat advocacy group Alley Cat Allies. Holtz lobbies for the trap, neuter and return method nationwide and offered county officials an ordinance she wrote specifically for Paulding County, she said.

The county’s animal control law requires owners to keep control of an animal with a leash “or similar physical control device,” keep them confined within a fenced area or building, and not allow them to have access to another person’s property without the owner’s permission.

“It’s essentially saying that a cat has to stay indoors,” Holtz said.

Feral cats are house cats that have changed their nature to being wild, or are born in the wild. The Paulding shelter does not adopt them out because of their natural resistance to domestication and is forced to euthanize them.

Holtz said the trap, neuter and return method reduces the feral cat population more humanely. The cats are neutered or spayed, rendered unable to reproduce and the colony of feral cats reduces or disappears from natural causes, she said.

Carmichael said in anticipation of the upcoming budget, he planned to ask county staff members to compile cost figures for the plan.

He admitted some residents have questioned the costs, though he said such a method likely would eliminate the cost of feeding and eventually cremating the animal.

Paulding’s shelter already reduces its cost through use of volunteers who actively work to help stray animals. Those volunteers could be used to help trap the cats, Carmichael said.

He said 300 counties and municipalities nationwide have trap, neuter and return ordinances.

Carmichael also said he wanted to create a new shelter staff position to focus on encouraging adoptions. The increased revenue from adoptions would eventually pay for the position, he said.

“The kill rate, in my opinion, is too high,” he said.

Capt. LeAnn LeHolm of the Paulding County Marshal’s Bureau, which oversees the county animal shelter, said she agrees with the neuter and spay part of the plan, but believes returning the feral cat to the same location would be a problem for many property owners who may kill the unwanted stray animal.

LeHolm said, based on the numbers, the best method of reducing the number of stray animals would be spaying and neutering all adopted animals. She estimated the cost at about $89,000 annually.

A total of 146 feral cats, or about 15 percent, were euthanized in 2013. Another 167 were euthanized in 2012, or about 9 percent of the total that year, LeHolm said.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Sal Grey
|
June 26, 2014
Just saw that links are not accepted, so am re-submitting my comment with those removed.

That TNR reduces feral and stray populations is fiction. Making this claim is a typical method used to convince city councilors and citizens to enact TNR. TNR is a maintenance program. In 30 years of tnr programs, there is not one study proving that tnr reduces citywide populations. One of the first TNR programs established was in London in the 70's. That colony still exists and at the same numbers. Believing what Alley Cats says is like believing the wolf's recommendations for improvements to the chicken house.

Groups like Alley Cats ignore and try to discredit the peer reviewed science that exposes the risks to human health, wildlife devastation, the restrictions to property rights, and the cruelty to the cats themselves. If one just examines their claims, through some research and critical thinking, their claims fall apart. Best Friends, a cohort with Alley Cats, doesn't run TNR on its 1,000 acres in Utah, it runs TENVAC (trap-evaluate-neuter-vaccinate-adopt-contain), described below. Obviously, TNR is good enough for YOUR neighborhood, but not good enough for theirs!

TENVAC is the better choice; it is a cat sanctuary method.

Unlike TNR, TENVAC protects everyone, including the cats.

Unlike TNR, TENVAC acknowledges, respects, and addresses the issues of all stakeholders, without compromising the most important concerns of each.

Unlike TNR, TENVAC can unite a community divided by the cat issue.

Councilors, please conduct a benefit analysis before you agree to legislate TNR, and do some independent research. As an example of what some research can uncover and a proper method before enacting legislation that affects an entire citizenry, Savannah appointed a taskforce to examine the issue and refused to enact TNR based on human health risks.

Hundreds of news articles, CDC reports on rabies in feral cat populations, position statements from professional organizations, and scientific studies disproving TNR and the claims of its advocates are easily accessed on the internet.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides