No variable specified
Williams withdraws from race for father’s judgeship; governor to appoint replacement at end of year
by Tom Spigolon
March 18, 2014 03:33 PM | 2238 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Paulding attorney Elizabeth Williams withdrew from the race for her father’s Superior Court judgeship Monday, leaving the governor to appoint a replacement after Judge James Osborne retires at the end of this year.

Williams said in an emailed statement she would ask the Georgia Secretary of State’s office to reopen qualifying “so that I or anyone will have additional time to qualify.”

However, Secretary of State spokesman Jared Thomas said no “legal mechanism” existed to open qualifying now that the only candidate has withdrawn after the end of the qualifying period.

Williams qualified March 7 for the judgeship after Osborne qualified for re-election March 3. Osborne then formally withdrew from the race March 10, leaving his daughter the only candidate in the race to succeed him.

Williams told a reporter she and Osborne agreed on a method in which she would succeed Osborne by the judge qualifying and leaving the race once she also qualified for the same seat.

Williams said she “did not intend to bring criticism on me, my father, the judicial election process, or anyone, but I am aware that some people have expressed criticism and concern.”

“I qualified as a candidate for Paulding Superior Court judge in good faith and complied with every law in that regard,” Williams said.

“I qualified because I come from a family of lawyers who has long been committed to public service and I share their deep love for Paulding County,” she said.

Her withdrawal followed media reports of an agreement between Williams, Osborne and the State Judicial Qualifications Commission.

The agreement called for Williams to withdraw from the race. Osborne also would be unable to seek re-election or reappointment to the post he has held since 2005, an Atlanta newspaper reported.

The agency, which has the power to remove a judge for ethics violations, agreed not to pursue ethics charges against Osborne or Williams, though she could seek another judicial position in the future, the paper reported.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides