No variable specified
Residents ask FAA to remove contractor doing environmental assessment of Paulding airport
by Staff Reports
May 20, 2014 08:24 PM | 2551 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Patti Smith of Dallas shows her opposition to proposed commercial air service last week.
Patti Smith of Dallas shows her opposition to proposed commercial air service last week.
Some Paulding residents today called for the Federal Aviation Administration to remove the contractor selected for an environmental assessment of the proposed expansion of Silver Comet Field airport because it is biased.

In comments filed with the FAA today, the residents, some of whom live and own property near the airport, said the assessment has been corrupted by the selection of a contractor with a direct financial interest in the proposed airport expansion.

“The contractor selected to prepare the assessment is tainted by a financial interest in the airport’s expansion, which is the subject of the assessment,” said attorney Peter Steenland of the Sidley, Austin LLP firm in Washington, D.C., who along with Atlanta attorney Charles McKnight Jr. of the firm of Nations, Toman & McKnight, LLP, represents the landowners opposing the project.

“They cannot be expected to prepare an objective analysis of this project, which could have a significant impact on the environment and potentially transform the region with a major commercial airport,” Steenland said.

Steenland noted that “this is only the latest case of public officials using their influence and power to try to force residents into accepting a major project that could fundamentally change the quality of life in Paulding County.”

According to the comments filed today, the contractor, Michael Baker Inc., and its subsidiary, the LPA Group, have been consultants for the Paulding Airport Authority for more than a decade, and continue to provide services today. In addition, the current airport director, Blake Swafford, is a former LPA employee. Swafford is one of the chief proponents of the proposed airport expansion.

“A contractor selected to conduct the FAA’s environmental assessment must be objective,” McKnight said, “but he’s irrevocably tainted here.”

Swafford, however, told an Atlanta TV station he had not worked for the company for 14 years. He also told the station he would not participate in the assessment.

The residents called on the FAA to begin the assessment anew with an independent contractor that has no bias or financial ties to the airport or the investors behind the proposed expansion.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides